A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted national focus adhering to an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Situations report about René Collier as well as the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has progressed into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design performs at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, look for to make their loved ones home. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, in which progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting produced by their prospective neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted less than arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their planning permission by creating a wall over and above the boundaries of their internet site, bringing about an encroachment with a Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such locations are issue to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, notably in the sensitive coastal atmosphere which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their setting up permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly developed, is in the correct situation. Their legal team has characterised the action being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in order to protect their look at, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, where views of The ocean are both of those very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable endeavours because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, As outlined by sworn proof referenced from the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-superior water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has since come to be emblematic on the depth of the dispute. These actions were not simply symbolic; they ended up meant to Collect visual evidence in the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from the sea Irish Occasions reported, describing how the two Adult men entered the h2o through intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most putting descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely noted that these actions have been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were protected intimately with the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders should be granted to halt design pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
On the core of your dispute can be a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as made, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is not a trivial René Collier technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been described as meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling paperwork, maps, and disorders hooked up towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by worry for environmental safety and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving A non-public watch, insisting in its place that it is about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their very long-standing relationship to the region and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few merely seeking to create a household household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are carried out determined by Skilled guidance and permitted programs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as coming into the sea through a storm, never change the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal web-site is now a shorthand description to get a situation a large number of observers see as increasingly common. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among personal land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become more contentious.
The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Formerly been involved with neighborhood advocacy on arranging and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from incredibly various Experienced backgrounds can find on their own aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, are becoming synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both the Bodily fact from the coastline along with the symbolic character of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result stays unsure. The court will have to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and arranging situations. Nonetheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who will have to live together with each other prolonged following the authorized expenses are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation increase past that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the significance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Additionally, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary difficulties for instance environmental defense and home legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of organic beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. No matter whether it's going to ultimately be altered, eradicated, or finished as prepared will depend on the courtroom’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue on to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent times.